top of page
  • Alistair Tait

Can Pelley Secure His Golfing Legacy?

You have to wonder when Keith Pelley’s Road to Damascus moment occurred. That’s one thought after reading the outgoing European Tour chief executive’s comments in Dubai this week.

“What I would like to see is the game becoming unified with a global strategy,” Pelley said. “The growth of the game is global. I think that’s where the focus needs to be”

Is this the same Keith Pelley who once had a chance to strengthen the European Tour’s presence on a truly global stage but spurned that chance to form a “strategic alliance” with the PGA Tour? It certainly is.


The 60-year-old Canadian, who in April heads back to Canada to become president and chief executive of Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment, says there’s common desire for a global game.

“I think with the emergence of FSG (Fenway Sports Group), which owns Liverpool, they understand the importance of global. PIF (Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund) certainly understands the importance of being global.”

Oh, and not just FSG and the PIF.

“I think the PGA Tour is coming to the realisation global is the key for the growth,” Pelley asserts. “They have heard me say it once or twice.” 

Did he say it even once when he signed the Euro Tour into a 13-year strategic alliance with the PGA Tour? Doubtful, considering until June last year Pelley and PGA Tour CEO Jay Monahan viewed the PIF and LIV Golf as the evil empire.


Fact is, the body Pelley is leaving is the weak partner in talks involving the PIF, FSG and the PGA Tour. Imagine how strong a position the now DP World Tour would be in if Pelley had taken a different course of action regarding the PIF when he had the chance.


As one former high ranking European Tour official said to me recently upon the news of Pelley’s departure:

“His legacy will be how he dropped the ball with the world at his feet.”

Former European Tour chief executive Ken Schofield was more forthright. In a Golf Digest article, Schofield tells John Huggan:

“Not going with the Saudis astonished me. Had they come to us back in the day, my board would have demanded that we find a way forward with them. I like to think I wouldn’t have needed to be directed to do just that. I would have done so without being told. That was my job. Now, of course, the European Tour is at the beck and call of Mr. Monahan. They had the chance to be on the top floor with the Saudis.”

Much has been written about Pelley’s legacy. Most of it positive, but there are question marks over his time in office.


Pelley’s willingness to think outside the box was a breath of fresh air. He introduced innovative events that went against the grain of standard 72-hole stroke play: the Belgian Knockout, the Shot-Clock Masters and GolfSixes.


He introduced the Rolex Series, tournaments worth a minimum of $7 million. His greatest achievement may have been putting a schedule together during Covid, a huge feat considering the many logistical problems of dealing with so many different nations.


He also introduced the G4D Tour, for which he also deserves massive credit.



Those innovative events? They no longer exist. The Shot Clock Masters was only played once. The Belgian knockout only lasted two years. The GolfSixes was played three times.


Those lucrative Rolex Series events designed to entice Europe’s big stars to play their home circuit? Pelly’s goal was 10 per year. The series peaked at eight tournaments, while there have been five on the schedule the last few years, and three of those are in the United Arab Emirates. Oh, and it would be interesting to find out the cost to Euro Tour coffers to subsidise said Rolex events.


Getting DP World as title sponsors was a big deal. However, even the lucrative prize fund for the season ending DP World Tour Championship, $10 million this year, isn’t enough to lure Europe’s top stars every season. Rory McIlroy, Jon Rahm, Viktor Hovland and Justin Rose are among the top players who’ve skipped the tournament in recent years.


European stalwarts such as Lee Westwood, Ian Poulter, Henrik Stenson, Graeme McDowell, Sergio Garcia and Martin Kaymer were cast as pariahs during Pelley’s reign. A tag they did not deserve.


Most controversial of all Pelley’s moves is sending the top-10 most promising Euro Tour players to the PGA Tour every year. Eddie Pepperrell called that decision a “disaster,” and many agree. How is giving away your 10 most promising prospects to a rival good for any business?


Pelley’s legacy to this grand old game will be in little doubt if he can play even a small part over the next few months to make professional golf truly global. That's a tall order. Indeed, it might be the impossible dream since there has been no appetite for it over the decades.


Peter Thomson advocated a world tour long before Pelley was even a boy dreaming of playing for his beloved Maple Leafs. Greg Norman was denounced as a heretic for calling for a world tour back in the 1990s.


For those who don’t see the world of golf through PGA Tour-tinted spectacles – and goodness knows there are plenty who can’t see beyond PGA Tour hegemony – a world tour makes perfect sense.


If only Pelley had realised that when LIV Golf came into existence and had implored everyone to get around the table and do what was best for golf, then the professional game might not be in its current mess. Still, better late than never I suppose.


#JustSaying: “Keith’s greatest period was probably Covid…He was amazing during that period, a real leader.” Thomas Bjorn

Recent Posts

See All

It Pays To Listen To A Good Caddie

There were times reading The Secret Tour Caddie when I wondered if those running men’s professional golf should be replaced by people who perhaps know the professional game better. Those who caddie on

The Height Of Golf Hypocrisy

It’s hard not to shake your head and laugh at the sheer hypocrisy surrounding Jon Rahm’s move to LIV Golf. Fred Couples is the latest example of someone who seems to have developed amnesia to join in


Jan 23


Thanks for getting in touch. The great thing for you, me and millions of ordinary club/recreational golfers is that what happens in the pro game doesn't affect us one iota. I still love George Peper's line at a Golf Writers Dinner at St Andrews. The former Golf Magazine editor, with the bosses of the PGA and European Tour just feeet from him said, and I paraphrase: Golf isn't about the FedEx Cup or the Race to Dubai. If professional golf was wiped off the map tomorrow, average golfers would remove their caps as a sign of respect and just keep on playing as they've always done.

I felt like punching the air as I listened to Peper. He was/is…


Jan 18

Looked at in Keith Pelley's own terms I agree with you Alistair that he made the wrong call in his dealings with the Saudis. It was he who took their money and set up the Saudi International before LIV came along so he could not play the sports- washing card. But he then decided to spurn the Saudis go with the PGA tour, which has resulted in the baffling decision to give away his ten best players each season (presumably as the quid pro quo for PGA tour money supporting European tour purses).

But as per our previous exchanges I am on the other side of the sports-washing argument. So for me Pelley did the right thing, but for the…

Feb 03
Replying to

Yes Alastair, I accept that the lines are blurred, and it is possible to take your viewpoint. So on this we will just have to disagree I suppose. All the best, Jeremy


Jan 18

I do have trouble getting past the fact that all of the rhetoric over the last 2 / 3 years is all about the Professional business of golf. What does all this do for the person who pays their subscriptions annually, plays once or twice a week if they is lucky, is ripped if if he or she wants to watch it on TV. What benefit do they derive?? If any ?? Should they expect any at their lowly status in the golfing environment?? Golf was played before the Professional came about. No doubt it started as a hustle. Has it changed or just moved up a level.

bottom of page